My interpretation is aligned with this: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/sdi/7.2.0.2?topic=reference-rest...
"...but creates no load and consumes no per-client storage on the set of servers or on the network"
So no, per-client session state would be against the principles of REST in my view.
My interpretation is aligned with this: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/sdi/7.2.0.2?topic=reference-rest...
"...but creates no load and consumes no per-client storage on the set of servers or on the network"
So no, per-client session state would be against the principles of REST in my view.