Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think you are misunderstanding the statelessness of REST. Each HTTP request is stateless in the sense that it can be understood without having previous HTTP requests around. But you can build sessions on top of that (= into your application) and that is not "against the rules".

Also, with regarding to REST "front-end servers" aren't part of the discussion, but an implementation detail.




I am sorry, I don't agree with your interpretation.

My interpretation is aligned with this: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/sdi/7.2.0.2?topic=reference-rest...

"...but creates no load and consumes no per-client storage on the set of servers or on the network"

So no, per-client session state would be against the principles of REST in my view.





Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: