This is a pretty good idea but what if we simulated actual store UI such as Amazon

>what if we simulated actual store UI such as Amazon

A phone call from Amazon lawyers.

definitely am trying to avoid getting sued. Made it as close as I could without it being exact. Also thinking of adding additional skins to match stores where users find themselves spending for no reason.

There's also this article for further discussion: https://www.harness.io/blog/bias-against-null-javascript

> Be honest... when was the last time you ran pip install and didn't end up in dependency hell?

Never? If you use proper encapsulation (e.g. tools such as pipx or using virtual environments), that's a non-issue. It only gets bad when there's Python version incompatibilities

Have you seen Mojo?

More serious reply: us and Mojo have similar visions of where the world is going. The key difference between us is that Mojo is itself a new programming language. Sure, it supports Python, but it doesn't actually compile Python. It simply delegates all interactions with Python code to the CPython interpreter: https://docs.modular.com/mojo/why-mojo/#compatibility-with-p...

But beyond that, our goal is meeting devs where they are. This means that beyond just compiling Python code, we provide SDKs for different frameworks (JavaScript, Kotlin, Swift, React Native, Unity, etc) that devs can use to run these functions within their applications, in as little as two lines of code.

We're very (very) focused on developers shipping products that use Function. We're already embedded in web apps, apps on the App Store, Play Store, and other places.

Excalidraw and Mermaid

What about the Glove80?

Put this back on HN when you can download it and try it out (like Servo).

you can do that today, I've been downloading and trying this out since before it was spun off SerenityOS

HN is (supposed to be) a technical community so pulling the code and building it is no problem

No, this post is perfectly fine where it is: a dev forum full of people who may be interested in the source code and contributing to this ongoing project.

What about HTTPie? https://httpie.io/

These things can be on Arxiv??

I assumed Arxiv was peer-reviewed content only, but it looks like that is not the case.

Submission guidelines: https://info.arxiv.org/help/submit/index.html

Moderation process: https://info.arxiv.org/help/moderation/index.html

On the contrary, ArXiv is for pre-prints, i.e. not (yet) peer-reviewed. Off the top of the my head, it was initially used by physicists who often have huge collaborations and long reviewing time. Then the ML community invaded the space later on. This does not mean a peer-reviewed paper cannot go there of course.

Most of the times the peer review version has a copiright restriction, so the arxiv version is the finañ draft that may have small differences.

As an academic, I always thought of arxiv as where you put your papers first, before they are peer reviewed. Before that we used our webpages, but they kept breaking.

Definitely, eg https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.00650

How would you set up tool installations? Inside the CI or inside the script?

In our environment (our product is a windows desktop application) we use packer to build a custom windows server 2022 image with all the required tools installed. Build agents run on a azure vm scale set that uses the said image for the instance os.