It seems that it's telling about the company's positive turnaround. They were making 200 million of losses, but they did some changes and now they became "the largest" - whatever that means.
Wonder how they are going to handle the complexities around crypto custody (esp. cold storage), given it's hard to sign transactions with multiple signatures when your workforce is distributed.
> Wonder how they are going to handle the complexities around crypto custody (esp. cold storage), given it's hard to sign transactions with multiple signatures when your workforce is distributed.
Multisig works great across distances. I’ve built coordination apps for multiple distributed parties to propose and approve and sign Bitcoin transactions before. It’s pretty straightforward.
By that logic, what's even the point of making laws to protect the rights of employees? As long as working is voluntary, people should be able to walk away from abusive workplaces, correct?
Possibly, but only because labor costs would rise. It would be a wealth transfer. Rents might rise, but so would taxes for those collecting rent (presumably they are on the upper end of the income/wealth scale).
I was so tuned into the subject, it took a minute to understand the lol material in the statement. @csence, thanks for showing that there is life outside of immigration.
