Yes, or pointing out anti-phishing training like it's anything special. The entire post is cringe imo.

They don't log.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44849129#44852102

"Pro-Science" and "Anti-Science" is too blunt of an instrument. It doesn't distinguish between the scientific method, journals, and institutions.

If someone has the opinion that the scientific method is great, but the current incentives at journals and institutions lead to poor practice of it too often, is that "anti-science?"

> "Pro-Science" and "Anti-Science" is too blunt of an instrument.

I agree, generally. However RFK Jr. and this administration are explicitly anti-science. If that seems extreme it's because it is - these are extremist ideologues.

They have attacked scientific method, institutions and journals though.

I'm glad someone knows how I feel.

Yes, the comments about "$25 name for a 5c concept" ring true when you're looking at a toy example with constructor(logger) { .. }.

Then you look at an enterprise app with 10 years of history, with tests requiring 30 mocks, using a custom DI framework that only 2 people understand, with multiple versions of the same service, and it feels like you've entered another world where it's straight up impossible to debug code.

It could be that the right call was for ATC to deny the request for visual separation and for them to do the deconflicting themselves. Not saying that's the case, I don't know, but that's one way it could be (partially) ATC's fault.

Got it working myself. I set up a share inside of Mobius Sync that reaches into the Obsidian folder. (note the entire thing, just one vault). I think there was a popup saying it was unsupported but I haven't had any problems yet.

This

Has the "no-hello" crowd realized what the "hello" is trying to achieve? It's a method of establishing a synchronous conversation.

For me, it's "It's important to note"

I get "intriguing" a lot from GPT-4. As well as replies that conclude with "In conclusion,...."

To be fair,

Completely disagree. All clocks and watches have a degree of uncertainty. Even a once a quarter time sync is enough to improve the accuracy. If you want to be sure you have the correct time, then you check and set against a reference source or press the button to see when last received. What is the harm that would be caused by an occasional sync?

It's not a given that the parents are addicted to phones. It's also not clear that access to large amounts of information driven by selection pressure of algorithms is automatically a good thing: some of these informational memes drive children to do harmful things (for example, the tide pod challenge).