I saw it earlier on reddit, and when I noticed it on hn, I was about to flag it for being yet another trash story copied from reddit, but then I saw that it already got 15 votes. I must be too young for this, but I did't find it funny, insightful or engaging, thus I did't feel any inclination to read more than a couple pages.
Try read it again. It really is a classic - tells of an age before everybody and their dog became programmers. It's a bit more subtle than the current fare and mixes humour and wisdom well.
The wise programmer is told about Tao and follows it. The average programmer is told about Tao and searches for it. The foolish programmer is told about Tao and laughs at it.
Which makes you sound like the average pseudo-science practitioner. They also keep telling others they "just don't get it", but perhaps someday, they will, of only the would 'embrace the teaching'. We scoff at that, but when someone uses the same approach with programming, while adding some Eastern sugar, we suddenly think it should be clear it's enlightening? Bollocks.
If you think the purpose of this is to be "enlightening", I suspect you may have missed the point. It's funny, in much the same way as the Principia Discordia is funny, and that's about it. It does rather a good job at it, too, imho.
I usually wouldn't care too much about karma for individual comments or posts but seeing the above comment being downvoted simply for not liking a book, I must say the voting patterns on HN are getting quite weird.
Unless a comment is offensive or distracting the conversation, take it easy with the downvotes people.
I recently thought that it might be an interesting experiment to not display any vote counts but instead order the posts based on them (as already done I guess).
