For those interested in the coin-flipping analysis, I strongly recommend "Fooled by Randomness", which is a smart, passionate, and funny examination of how that problem plays out in the investment industry.
The article is bs and reeks of ass-covering (and lots of other folks agree). If S&P 500 was such a bad benchmark, why did he bet $320k on being able to beat it? The other points (interest rates etc) amount to "We couldn't predict the future", which would normally be fine, but not when you are charging 2 & 20 to do so.
I'm guessing the money manager was able to get some new client funds because of his ability to put his money where his mouth is. 'I put my own money in this' is a strong argument. If it gained him $500m in funds at 2% fee, then a 1 mil losing bet is covered by new accounts in year 1.
http://longbets.org/362/
Seven years into the bet, he's way ahead:
http://fortune.com/2015/02/03/berkshires-buffett-adds-to-his...
For those interested in the coin-flipping analysis, I strongly recommend "Fooled by Randomness", which is a smart, passionate, and funny examination of how that problem plays out in the investment industry.