Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> pretty

I'd have comments on other points as well but if there is one thing KDE apps generally aren't then they consistently aren't pretty. I know, eye of beholder, but it's almost as bad as TK. In the link you provided there are:

- grooved borders between every second UI element.

- icons are way too colorful with gradients everywhere.

- underscore hints on menus are ugly.

- places panel takes up way too much space and eats away at the tree view panel.

That said, I use Dolphin, but only because other file browsers on Linux are for various reasons bigger catastrophes.



That's an old screenshot. Here's one from KDE 5.

https://www.kde.org/announcements/plasma5.0/screenshots/apps...


Better, but it still reinforces the notion that there's some secret rule somewhere requiring virtually all aspects of any Linux UI to be ugly.


Something that is definitely wrong with Linux is font rendering, it is really hard to get something decent, even when using tools like Infinality.


Is it me or does that look like GNOME2-era Nautilus? I always thought Nautilus was trying to be OSX' Finder too!


Most of the principals at Eazel the company that originally developed Nautilus were involved in the early development of the Macintosh.


I never knew that, thanks!


Most of those complaints seem to be down to fashion, rather than usability. In five years, people will be moaning about icons being "too monochrome" or "undifferentiated".

If you care deeply about the latest fashions and what the new black of UI design is this season, then KDE is definitely not for you. If you just want something that works then it can be fine. I don't find any of those things to hinder my actual use of KDE, quite the opposite.


> to be down to fashion

The bad design isn't of this trivial sort. If you think of stereotypical web pages from 90's you don't think that their design isn't current, you think that that their design is intrinsically bad.

> the latest fashions

KDE's analogue in clothing fashion is wearing potato sack. That is - this isn't even a mater of fashion. This isn't like ror, node or react.

> rather than usability

Nobody denies potato sacks can have nonzero usability. Visual clutter affects usability. That they completely fucked UI, even if usability were perfect, doesn't give users needed confidence that other areas were done competently either.


underscore hints on menus are ugly

Turn off that option in the OS; it's not an app thing. One of the nice things about KDE is that it still gives you old-school configurability.


I did that. It's still the wrong default.™ That's why I use KDE/Dolphin, you can beat it into something usable but you still have to eat the ugly which bothers me more than it should.


The default is usable by everyone. Having hints hidden by default means that it's not usable for everyone by default.

It's a matter of accesibility, not taste.


KDE apps can look very pretty if you find the right colorscheme, icon theme and widget style.

I love the sheer amount of customizability and options KDE offers.

I recommend Flattr icons[0] and the Hex QtCurve Style[1]

[0]: http://deviantn7k1.deviantart.com/art/Flattr-376383397

[1]: http://garthecho.deviantart.com/art/Hex-439924084




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: