So lets say I maintain some medium-to-large corporate websites (because, well, I do).
I want jsHub because it makes my sites load faster, right? How much faster? Any way to get some test cases or examples?
Differences in hit counts and visits between products are indeed annoying, but it serves as a check. How else would we know if traffic dipped overnight or jsHub went down? Also, I think part of the difference in those counts is due to different algorithms for what constitutes a "visit" and different filtering for bots.
And for the microformats, I hope you realize that's an uphill battle. I can't justify redesigning my pages to use some new format without a material benefit.
There is no 'jsHub' to go down. The entire thing is JavaScript inside the browser. There's no dependency on anything at jshub.org.
Microformats aren't asking for a page redesign. They are just class names. Our argument is that a clear specification is many times better than obscure JavaScript variables inside a Omniture tag, or parameters in a comScore Beacon, ...
Finally, the whole point of jsHub is that won't have to tag your site again. Adding a new product to a jsHub tagged web site means just changing the plugins in your jsHub set up.
I want jsHub because it makes my sites load faster, right? How much faster? Any way to get some test cases or examples?
Differences in hit counts and visits between products are indeed annoying, but it serves as a check. How else would we know if traffic dipped overnight or jsHub went down? Also, I think part of the difference in those counts is due to different algorithms for what constitutes a "visit" and different filtering for bots.
And for the microformats, I hope you realize that's an uphill battle. I can't justify redesigning my pages to use some new format without a material benefit.