Hm, I agree that github CR is not good. Glaf they're using Issues though as Github discussions are a _really nice_ way to build software. I personally find Gerrit painful to use, but has critical features, as enneff described. Hope Github really steps up to the plate.

Also, everyone who uses github whould really check out *Sourcegraph's code review stuff. They show you really useful things like:

- exactly what definitions were added/removed/changed (https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/fsouza/go-dockerclient/.p...)

- a diff with jump-to-definition links (https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/fsouza/go-dockerclient/.p...)

- a list of people and projects impacted by the change (https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/fsouza/go-dockerclient/.p...)

Totally gets rid of the "understanding the PR diff" problem others mentioned