Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What the hell? "The kids" are suddenly now "his kids"? And the woman is described as "his girlfriend", meaning they weren't married, meaning even if he's the biological father, he has no rights to them. If he's not going to take on the responsibilities of getting married, he's in no position to complain when she leaves!

-- Anyway, I didn't say his used of "bitch" proved anything. But I've seen enough people in abusive relationships to know that it's a clue. The fact that he would illegally (and surely, contrary to company policy) abuse his position as an AT&T employee to stalk her further clarifies the picture.



There is no legal requirement to be married in order for the father to have rights to his children.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: