Steve - general comment about your website. Good site and great reviews. I refer people to website builders all of the time (I know the HN crowd will probably frown on that comment). Good to see someone has taken the time to do a thorough review of all of them.
One thing you might want to add to your reviews is "ease of sharing". For the non-technically inclined (your audience) being able to share content is pretty big and is one of the major reasons I tell people to stay far far away from Wix. Example: http://imgur.com/TS1Z2Vq No images, no content, etc. Not to mention, from a technical perspective Wix is a nightmare.
It actually looks quite nice. Does it allow for further html edition? If so, is the html output semantic? While most editors' html is gibberish, so is the interface, so maybe Weebly also got this right
Weebly's markup is good- especially compared to most website builders markup with poor markup (as you pointed out). Wix probably has some of the worst markup among website builders.
If you don't know how web pages work, what pixels and padding and color values mean, all of these solutions suck. Small business owners, students, and even "computer savy" people have a hard time with this.
> Look how easy Weebly is to use compared to these other implementations!
Weebly isn't a joy to use. It's just easier to use than most of it's competitors, which is what this article focuses on.
The article is an in-depth look at Weebly. The bad examples are meant to show how easily a website builder's interface can get ugly. Squarespace wasn't included as a bad example because it has an excellent interface. In fact Squarespace and Weebly are the only website builders I've given a perfect score to in my website builders guide.
How do you feel about Webflow? I haven't used it personally but from what I've seen (watching over shoulders) it is more technical than most builders but very solid. The interface actually reminds me of Weebly, like expert-mode Weebly.
That's very fair. I look forward to it! I enjoy your reviews so far, the trend of legitimately useful sitebuilders is interesting. I yearn for a return of the geocities days, when everyone was pumping out lame websites instead of social network profiles.
One thing you might want to add to your reviews is "ease of sharing". For the non-technically inclined (your audience) being able to share content is pretty big and is one of the major reasons I tell people to stay far far away from Wix. Example: http://imgur.com/TS1Z2Vq No images, no content, etc. Not to mention, from a technical perspective Wix is a nightmare.