Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> (often) need some form of high availability

I'd guess that, in reality, many don't really need high availability. I mean, it's not going to hurt if they have it, but if it comes at a cost of not doing other things with their limited resources, it may not be the best thing to be doing.

BTW, it's Tcl, not TCL!




Gah, I should know better about the name. Let's just pretend I was yelling it because I was excited? k?

Anyway, it's a gradient. Sure, most places don't need 99.9999% availability, but most places also can't afford to be down for a few hours to a day, especially during their peak season.

So, do you need automatic failover and promotion? Probably not. Do you need contingency plans (with may/should include accounts with multiple vendors (even if something like a LiNode account with no boxes)) and have practiced brining everything up (or if you're e.g. a small retail shop, how to checkout), yes, most defiantly.

Even if your distributed system isn't "moving" you still need to plan for things. Like I said, if your database server becomes unavailable, you need to know how much data hasn't made it to the spare, otherwise you need to ask "How much will I loose if I restore from my last backup". Things of that nature need to be planned around and known, even if the code doesn't need t care.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: