The proposed solution is at the bottom of the article (which is why everyone seems to have ignored it):
> The solution to this problem is simple: peering at the original NSFnet exchange points should be forever free and if one participant starts to consistently clip data and doesn’t do anything about it, they should be thrown out of the exchange point.
I do have a couple questions though - who is in charge of the original NSFnet exchange points, and do they have this authority?
> The solution to this problem is simple: peering at the original NSFnet exchange points should be forever free and if one participant starts to consistently clip data and doesn’t do anything about it, they should be thrown out of the exchange point.
I do have a couple questions though - who is in charge of the original NSFnet exchange points, and do they have this authority?