Yes, that's implied. But you add a good point - DRM doesn't even stop piracy and as such the official reason it's usually justified with is completely invalid. This only strengthens the expectation that DRM is used for completely different purposes, so it makes it more obvious that it should be opposed and never trusted.
Yeah, I just felt like making it explicit. Try finding a Hollywood blockbuster that isn't trivially available on the pirate bay - but they still encrypt and region-lock the DVDs anyway. If they keep a movie from being leaked onto the internet before it launches in theaters, that's a big win for them.
I updated the phrase. That's a good point to direct to publishers who aren't crooked but are mistakenly trapped in this DRM mentality. Such ones can be convinced.
For example GOG is successful in negotiating with various gaming publishers about releasing even recent games DRM-free. Negotiating with crooks who use DRM for side reasons can't be productive, but negotiating with those who use DRM out of habit or notion that "it's a standard in the industry" is possible. According to GOG, they had many meetings with representatives from various companies and they asked for graphs, charts and other information about how GOG operate and how successful is their DRM-free approach. Sometimes that results in DRM-free releases. And the more they do it, the easier is for them to demonstrate that.
Unfortunately video industry lacks any serious distributor who would want to do such kind of work. Netflix and Co. are too comfortable obliging the DRM insanity.
