What are the odds of programs like SublimeText being able to run on ARM in the near future? I'm sure Eclipse would be far too heavy.
Most of the 'Chromebook as a developer laptop' make it into a fancy SSH terminal - which is fine. But I don't really see a 'terminal' as a 'developer laptop'. I understand you can still access the internals of Linux along with the shell and other languages, but it doesn't work for a lot of people when you can't use the same apps/devices as you can on a your 'normal' machine.
A $999 XPS 13 or MacBook Air looks pretty inviting, even at 3X the price of a $299 Chromebook when you realize how much productivity gain there is when you don't have to dink around with the OS and aren't limited in your app selection.
With crouton, there are very few Linux apps that you can't run on a Chromebook. While I haven't tried it with SublimeText, I have run Eclipse on my Chromebook. It's not the smoothest experience, but it can get the job done.
So far, Arduino and IntelliJ are the only apps that I haven't gotten working on my Chromebook. The former relies on some x86 libraries that obviously won't work on an ARM processor, and the latter prefers the Oracle JVM which is just too much of a pain for me to set up when OpenJDK and Eclipse work well enough. I've also had some issues with my VPN (IPSec Xauth PSK).
I probably wouldn't recommend a Chromebook as a full time development machine, but it can certainly be done better than just a fancy SSH terminal. It's served me well enough when I've needed to work on the road. It's the best traveling laptop I've ever owned.
Android Studio, who is based on IntelliJ, didn't like the fact that I was running OpenJDK on my notebook but it worked. You should probably check on IntelliJ again.
I recommend nuking ChromeOS entirely and installing your distro of choice (don't bother with crouton or whatever). Then you use it like you normally would.
The main attraction with Chromebooks is the hardware, not ChromeOS.
I've been using a Chromebook as a development laptop for a few months after leaving my real laptop on a train (it was possibly the stupidest thing I've done due to caffeine withdrawal).
Yes, it can function as an SSH Client, but its up there with the worst SSH clients you've encountered. Its slow, and its ugly. You'll also have problems when it comes to more advanced things.
Like copying a CSV you generated with a script on the real computer you're SSHed into so that you can email it to someone.
I did briefly run a full Ubuntu install in a chroot, which made things a little nicer, but I swapped one set of problems for a whole new set, such as multiple displays not working.
Having said all that, if you're not a developer Chromebooks are lovely things.
Does that terminal emulator handle all control sequences that xterm would allow? When I tried ChromeOS, whatever terminal emulator I was using was largely worthless for me because Chrome was intercepting certain control sequences and not allowing the terminal emulator to get them.
It's not quite as capable as the original, but I've put together a Sublime-like editor running as a Chrome app, because I thought it was ridiculous to have to run Vim in a chroot just to do some editing. I'd love to get feedback from any developers working on Chrome OS: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/caret/fljalecfjcio...
Since I primarily work with C, SQL, or Python, Chromebook and crouton has worked just fine as a development machine. The only drawback has been that I can't seem to natively get the terminal to support more than 16 colors, which makes vim look rather bland. I can enable the full 256 for use with the solarized settings if I use tmux (tmuxing to your localhost is rather strange, admittedly), but the lack of scrolling on tmux sessions is a little annoying.
While this is probably very helpful to Chromebook owners, it doesn't make me want to use a Chromebook for development, or understand the choice.
If the hardware is particularly good (is it?), why doesn't someone make it easier to just straight up run Linux from the hard drive? I mean no weird scripts, SD cards, etc. but just a proper distro like Debian.
With the exception of the Pixel the advantage of most Chromebooks is that they are cheap and fairly nice in terms of portability.
> why doesn't someone make it easier to just straight up run Linux from the hard drive? I mean no weird scripts, SD cards, etc. but just a proper distro like Debian.
> When the boot screen appears hit Ctrl-L, SeaBIOS will come up and say "Hit ESC to choose boot device" so hit ESC and choose the USB device you plugged in.
[...]
> Every time you boot up you'll need to do that Ctrl-L song and dance, since unfortunately you can't make SeaBIOS the default 30-sec timeout selection.
The pixels have fantastic screens, the other chromebooks are fantastically cheap. The hardware on regular chromebooks is apparently great for the price, the hardware on the pixel is not great except for the screen. If neither of those things are what you are looking for, then steer clear of chromebooks.
(I use a Pixel with plain old Debian. I have to press Ctrl-L every time I boot, as DanBC describes.)
If Google came out with a 13" Chromebook for around the same price, I'd buy that in a heartbeat. The 11" version is just too darn small for my beefy hands.
I felt (and still feel) the same way. A 13" Chromebook would be the sweet spot for most on-the-go developers. I've seen the HP 14" Chromebooks but couldn't get myself to pay the price difference.
Interesting that there are ways to keep Chrome OS around. Most developers I know using one just go pure Ubuntu and don't care at all about keeping Chrome OS as a dual boot option or whatever.
It uses crouton to setup a bare minimum dev environment, using Sublime as the editor. It's designed for people who use ChromeOS for most things, but want a good text editor on top of that.
If you get around replacing chrome OS with linux and reflashing the firmware with uboot, you'll lose GPU acceleration (3D and 2D). ARM is pretty shitty about releasing specs for their GPUs, so the Chromebook GPU (Mali T604) remains unused.
I think the thing that has always held me back from finally pulling the trigger on A chromebook pixel is the fact that you have to dismiss the "developer mode" popup everytime you boot. I guess that is a bit of a nitpick though and it otherwise seems like a solid machine.
It's annoying, but it's not much different from seeing the BIOS screen on an old Wintel machine. It still starts up quickly enough that I'm more likely to turn it off than to sleep it.
I don't get it. If Linux or Windows is the end goal, why not start with a Surface Pro (2)?
The startup popup is annoying, but that's at most a one-off per day. It's the pixel's trackpad, mushy keyboard, and weak screen hinge that turns me off from using it as a dev machine.
It's great for couch surfing or as an ipad replacement, but I expect a dev machine to be more than a screen and a cheap price.
Most of the 'Chromebook as a developer laptop' make it into a fancy SSH terminal - which is fine. But I don't really see a 'terminal' as a 'developer laptop'. I understand you can still access the internals of Linux along with the shell and other languages, but it doesn't work for a lot of people when you can't use the same apps/devices as you can on a your 'normal' machine.
A $999 XPS 13 or MacBook Air looks pretty inviting, even at 3X the price of a $299 Chromebook when you realize how much productivity gain there is when you don't have to dink around with the OS and aren't limited in your app selection.