when a company is of a certain size and top management is making millions, radical change becomes impossible
BB is dying, because it needed a radical change, but top management, I think, were too afraid to act on it
This is even true of lower levels inside organization, managers accept defeat rather than challenge it by requesting a radical change
To add more, I believe manager prefer to fail for doing small changes, rather than fail .. because they took on radical changes ...
they should have gone radical, but they went incremental, because its better for management to fail that way
when a company is of a certain size and top management is making millions, radical change becomes impossible
BB is dying, because it needed a radical change, but top management, I think, were too afraid to act on it
This is even true of lower levels inside organization, managers accept defeat rather than challenge it by requesting a radical change
To add more, I believe manager prefer to fail for doing small changes, rather than fail .. because they took on radical changes ...
they should have gone radical, but they went incremental, because its better for management to fail that way