Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

People dance in the streets for everything in the Arab world. I can assure you that there is lots of hootin' and hollerin' in Indiana about similar atrocities visited upon our enemies - we just don't dance, is all.



Giving your ignorance the benefit of the doubt, 'mericans are too busy getting high, and (/or) too fat and lazy (/or) just too uninterested in foreign affairs to give a rats ass about baying for the blood of XYZ special interst group with a terrorist agenda. The people that tend to "hoot and holla" in <repsonse> to violence are by far and large predominantly black and latinos. Or canadians after a hockey match. So you're walking down a slippery slope to racism and/or irellevance with this comparison. Terrorists are another animal...bred by demand and bloodlust...ex ante. As a general rule, Americans are too busy being ignorant (of the world's nuances) to have the kind of thing drive their day to day thinking. You do see this in inner cities occasionally (like London) but again, your looking at a racist subsampling of the population.

I will say though, that the war on drugs is not a flattering picture for Americans. Drugs come into this country because of demand (primarily), not because of supply. The supply happens because the demand is so high, the economics are so compelling. The markup and profit margins on something like cocaine are enourmous. Just last week you had a couple of brits arrested in peru. carying $1-2m of drugs. Going to Ibiza. Do you really think the peruvians are the ones with the Drug problem? Of course not. It's rather the (relatively) rich europeans that want to get off their faces in the Clubs. Where, btw, paying for drugs is cheaper than booze. But absent gold or diamond mining, there is just nothing else with this kind of profit margin and $$/mass ratio available to people that live in the rual hilsides (where cocoa is farmed) in S. America.

Which sort of gets us to root causes. War and drugs and Terrorism are demand side phenomena. But baby killing is not really all that trendy or fashionable. Except for in some parts of the world.


So - giving your own ignorance the benefit of the doubt - I'm assuming you intend to imply that baby killing is trendy in fashionable in the Arab world? But (white) people calling for the extermination of entire swathes of the world population don't exist in the United States?

That's a pretty fucking big benefit I've extended your own ignorance. I recommend you pull your head out of your ass and examine reality for once, my friend. You've clearly never been to a red state if you think blacks, Latinos, and Moooslims have a monopoly on violent thought.

I have no idea why you bring the recreational pharmaceutical economy into the picture. Consider learning to argue a single point. Are you trying to imply that only one vice can be attributed to a single ethnic group at a time?

And wait. Are you honestly trying to tell me that trendy baby killing is a root cause of Muslim violence? To bring things back to your pharmaceutical argument - what the hell are you smoking, son?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: