I host more websites on the same server and as kajecounterhack said I'm using nginx as a reverse proxy. The server is fast and have no problems at all with the HM crowd ;)
On my tests it's a few 100 requests faster per second than nginx but the average should be around the same. The kernel is the bottleneck in this case I believe.
There isn't any "selling point" ;) Anyone could use it as they like. The main usage for me has been in other projects where I needed a fast and lightweight http server. Such as tracking servers etc. It's pretty "experimental" but I think I will use the "original" server to serve a web app that I will be launching soon. The problem for me has been the lack of a reverse proxy.
But why do you need reverse proxy at all if your server is as good as Nginx? And if the speed is comparable and Nginx has more features why did you write your server then?
If I understand, it's "lighter" than Nginx. Why not writing how much lighter and in which aspects? Of course I can compare the code bases, but you know exactly as you wrote yours, so it would be really nice if you'd write what you know. Thanks.
Having HN crowd coming and testing your server would be a great test, no?