If the government wanted to have a room in an office building for a long period of time to spy on a company in the sam building it is reasonable to charge rent & for utilities. I don't see how this is different?
(I agree in principle that warrantless spying is wrong. But if a warrant is issued I certainly don't see why a company shouldn't charge for their resource use)
If the government wanted to have a room in an office building for a long period of time to spy on a company in the sam building it is reasonable to charge rent & for utilities. I don't see how this is different?
(I agree in principle that warrantless spying is wrong. But if a warrant is issued I certainly don't see why a company shouldn't charge for their resource use)