Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Who are you talking about? Elden or his client? The article implies Facebook was Elden's only way of reaching his client, so the "idiot" appears to have been the client. If the client is not very technical it is not unreasonable to assume the client felt Facebook was easier for him to use to communicate covertly with Elden and didn't want to give out a phone number or other details.



Either. Facebook retains forever anything done or written on their platform and that's a well known fact.

Why anyone would use it for anything remotely confidential, is beyond me.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: