Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

By the same author:

"A method includes addressing, through a command generated by an application executing on a computing platform, one or more device(s) in storage communication with the computing platform based on an appropriate communication link. The method also includes accessing, based on the addressing, a physical register of the one or more device(s) through an appropriate interface therein. Further, the method includes obtaining statistical information associated with a performance of the one or more device(s) at the computing platform through the access of the physical register."

http://www.google.com/patents/US20120144069




How do you get a patent regarding "A method includes addressing, through a command generated by an application [...] based on an appropriate communication link" to be issued?

All I read was "This patent regards using a software-controlled computer to communicate with another computer in an arbitrary manner which can allow for data statistics and performance tracking. Oh, wait, that's not specific... Hmm... Oh wait! Yes, and you have to get the data from a register."


"How do you get a patent ..."

The only way I can make sense of these ridiculous patents is if the patent examiners are under pressure to grant patents as part of their yearly performance metrics.


Patent examiners actually take pride in their high rejection ratio.


And yet the environment in which they work encourages more granted patents, as the new patent examination facilities being promoted by the administration imply (to me). Obama's/admin's stated reasons are to grant more patents faster.


Their rejection rate by women? Seriously, we keep seeing these brain dead patents. If the patent examiner doesn't understand linked lists, they shouldn't be examining the patents!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: