Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> but the scientific solution is to sterilize the kids and their parents to end a bad blood line

Not even a good solution, the amount of good people we'd be missing out on would be huge. Plenty of great people come from shit parents/backgrounds.



How do we break the cycle?


If there is risk of getting less great people, should we even risk that by breaking the cycle?


Yes. The earths population could be decimated and society would continue on. We could certainly benefit by losing the violent ones.


> The earths population could be decimated and society would continue on

Which it has, in the past, multiple times. But how would we know if we're better off with those "decimation events" or not? Kind of hard to know without some alternative reality where those didn't happen.


Well, I guess we have to run some experiments decimating the earth then list the pros and cons. Someone else can write the thesis, of course.


"We should sterilize 90% of the population because we can" is certainly one of the opinions of all time.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: