They usually protest, if that's what you're asking.
As a movement they're dependent on other organisations to carry them forward, hence why they infiltrate political parties, bully media outlets into disseminating their talking points and so on.
Using lawfare to try to take out a political opponent (ridiculous NY charge with no precedent, no victim, and from a DA who was famous for reducing felonies to misdemeanours but for Trump did the opposite)
Applying govt pressure to social media companies to censor content (twitter files etc)
Using the intelligence apparatus to try to take out a political opponent (russian collusion hoax, fake dossier)
Relying on the media lies to maintain power (border is secure, Biden is mentally competent etc)
Well these are all features of Stalin, Putin, the CCP and now the modern Democrat party.
All of your examples tell me you need to find a wider circle of news to read.
At the very least you're repeating propoganda. Every one I could easily refute, but what would be the point? I'm not going to convince you. You're happy in your bubble.
But don't think for a moment that you are certainly right.
Your comment is just meaningless words disconnected from reality.
And a very large number of people agree with me on some level.
We saw the evidence of that at the last election.
So my "bubble" is pretty large actually.
What about yours?
As a movement they're dependent on other organisations to carry them forward, hence why they infiltrate political parties, bully media outlets into disseminating their talking points and so on.