If you type some text into one of the documents in the web preview, click the triangle and click the name of that document, you'll get a redline. That's the current industry-standard diff format. Redlines don't standardize around any kind of metadata format, though, so parsing them (unlike a diff) is non-trivial. There's an opportunity for improvement.
As mentioned elsewhere, transactional lawyers are corporate lawyers who work on deals (think drafting corporate documents, M&A or IPOs) as opposed to litigators who go to court and argue cases.
Thank you. So this red squigeee line is the industry standard?
I built a simple "gpt wrapper" focused on legal - in the process of fine-tuning an llm, I've noticed that Gemini / Google scraped the hell out of a certain legal forum (phbb board) in my country. After that I've started focusing on court legal cases entries (since there's a public website for that) and thinking a bit about what would a diff in a court case ideally look like, and it's an interesting problem.
Your product reminds me a bit of quantus.finance (also here on HN) even though the space is not really related, but it caters to a business area in an interesting way. What are you planning on doing next (on a high level)?
If you type some text into one of the documents in the web preview, click the triangle and click the name of that document, you'll get a redline. That's the current industry-standard diff format. Redlines don't standardize around any kind of metadata format, though, so parsing them (unlike a diff) is non-trivial. There's an opportunity for improvement.
As mentioned elsewhere, transactional lawyers are corporate lawyers who work on deals (think drafting corporate documents, M&A or IPOs) as opposed to litigators who go to court and argue cases.