Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Poll: Should Apple accept an app that tracks drone kills? (cnn.com)
12 points by sirteno on Sept 3, 2012 | hide | past | favorite | 20 comments


As shocked as I am at this, I'm shocked at the response to the poll!


Why are you shocked? I'm shocked (maybe disgusted is the better word, as I was expecting it) at the fact that Apple bans Apps that simply transport Information, just because the information is not pleasant enough.


I believe there's a right to know about these goings on. Those drones are being used as part of operations funded by taxpayers.


It's not about this specific application -- it's about the proverbial slippery slope. If an app that tracks drone strikes, based on publicly available information, can be excluded, where do we draw the line? And more to the point, where do they (i.e. Apple) draw the line, and what qualifies them to be drawing it?

Just to test the waters, I'd like to see an app that automatically locates the nearest abortion clinic. Also an app that automatically locates the nearest gun store. But these apps should be submitted by different people, at different times, just to see how differently they're treated.

But I should be happy about this brouhaha -- in the final analysis, incidents like this can only increase Android's market share, because no single company can exclude an application from Android, as Apple rather arbitrarily does with apps designed for their platform.


Personally these drones are just scary all around as once one country uses this tech others will follow.

What's going to stop a more advanced drone from attacking other nations other then how the US uses them now?

Iran purportedly got their hands on one these drones...


It's a censored walled garden where nary a controversial idea should be shared. Apple bans all kinds of things from its playground, always has, always will. Let Apple and its users reap what they sow.


It's Apple's store I think they can decide to sell whatever they want and the consumer can decide to goto a different store (platform) if Apple isn't meeting their needs.


What about ethical responsibility?


Yeah exactly. If one doesn't like Apple decisions, just open another App Store that sells IOS Apps... uhm... wait... not possible. Ok, another idea: just start producing another smartphone that replaces the iPhone with something with a comparable look and feel... uhm... wait...


So perhaps this article serves the function of helping consumers make that decision.


So existing consumers should never voice their opinion to the company selling them stuff? Always just blindly switch product the moment you dislike its decisions? Never attempt intelligent discussions around product decisions?


I think the reason they rejected it is that there is no utility to it. Just open the webpage. They very often reject applications that duplicate web functionality.


It has push notifications.


They also reject apps that are apps only for push notifications.


To be fair email would do the job...


To be fair maybe people don't want to give out their email to everyone.


I've never, ever hesitated in giving out my email address to anyone (that includes sites that I know are scammers and would sell my email address to anyone practically for the asking). In the past ??? years (since GMail was in beta), I've received less than 5 spams.

(I know it's a little irrelevant to your point though, but wanted to say at least with gmail you don't need to fear giving you email address out)


Lets remove all newspaper apps too because e-mail would do the job. Also remove all other communication because e-mail would do the job.</sarcasm>


Also, what about a normal news app? They report unpleasant goings on in the world like drone killings.


They probably should!

Counter-poll: should news organizations return to reporting actual news?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: