Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

a segfault is completely unintentional. Had the kernel been older it could be used to execute code.


> a segfault is completely unintentional

Usually, but not always! https://jcdav.is/2015/10/06/SIGSEGV-as-control-flow/


> Faulted trying to access 0x10 - the offset in the string we were trying to read from :)

Is guaranteed that every offset you can try to read is guaranteed to create a segfault?


> Is guaranteed that every offset you can try to read is guaranteed to create a segfault?

The offset is fixed as part of the compiled code; the JVM can enforce that it's less than 4k (otherwise it can use an explicit NULL check), and that the first 4k page is always unmapped.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: