"65" is live action+CGI, and really borrows nothing whatsoever from JW. It "only...

		IAmBroom 68 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why are there no good dinosaur films? "65" is live action+CGI, and really borrows nothing whatsoever from JW. It "only" returned about 150% of its cost, and was pretty forgettable, alas. So your point about not getting traction may stand.