> with the lack of a war happening between them?

What was this, then?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_co...

thats what a "war" looked like when both parties have nukes

ukraine is what a war looks like when both parties dont have nukes

In case of Ukraine one party has nukes, the biggest nuke arsenal in the world actually

I think it was meant like not (A has nukes and B has nukes) rather than (not A has nukes) and (not B has nukes). Strange wording, I felt the same way too.

That's what they meant: that's what war looks like when both parties don't have nukes. It's usually the defending party which benefits from nukes the most; and both parties having nukes makes every war a very dangerous affair (if it goes unchecked, as opposed to limited like India-Pakistan).

Thats what i meant. Unles both parties have nukes, it will become a proper war where countries are destroyed

Looking at india pakistan, and ukraine russia, its clear whether you should give your nuclear arsenal up or not

The thing that lasted 4 days and had less than 100 people killed?