Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If not to build a nuke, why have a secret uranium enrichment facility built over 250 ft under a mountain?


That argument only works when normal aboveground civilian infrastructure won't get bombed anyway on suspicion.

Then both kinds require the same protection, and protection can't be used to distinguish between them.

"She's obviously a witch, because she's been living deep in the forest all suspicious-like ever since we burned down her cursed house."


60% enriched uranium is not quite considered weapons-grade, but also has no civilian applications. Hiding the facility is immaterial if the facility is doing stuff that isn't useful for non-weapon work.


Iran did not expect to be bombed back at all, which is why their defenses were so shoddy around nearly everything. The _only_ thing having this level of protection is the enrichment facility.


There is no non-nuclear weapon purpose valuable enough to build such a facility. It's obviously for nuclear bombs.


So every country which has facilities to enrich uranium, needs to be bombed, correct?


That's a separate question. I am just responding to the people saying we don't know they are enriching uranium for nuclear weapons. Of course they are.


It would have worked if Iran had stopped also paying people to shoot missiles so often and donating to kill Ukraine.


If you honestly think Iran is enriching uranium for clean energy, I have a bridge to sell you.


Gee, I dunno. Because some berserk moron might attack their country, maybe?

Countries without nukes get victimized by countries with nukes. If you haven't noticed this pattern yet, there's not much hope for you.


In the middle east, Iran is considered a serious enemy, and is widely detested. A nuclear armed Iran would immediately lead the rest of the middle east to pursue their own nuclear weapons program.


It is detested because Iran is Shia and the other countries around them are Sunni. The cause is religious, not "we don't like them because they are bad".


The publicly revealed, internationally inspected secret uranium enrichment facility?


Credible deterrent against stuff like this?


> Our intelligence concluded Iran wasn’t moving towards a nuke

> Credible deterrent against stuff like this?

You mean the credible deterrent is moving towards a nuke?


That is the point of what I was saying, yes.

Look I dgaf about what Iran was doing, there is no wool over my eyes about what that state is capable of. I saw the IEDs with copper cones used to kill and maim my friends, they almost certainly came from Iran.

What I care about is: congress declares war, not the executive. The people should decide, and we just stepped 10 steps closer to the monarchy we tried to depose 250 years ago.


This has been happening my entire 40+ years of life. I agree it shouldn’t, but this ain’t anything new. If this makes Trump a monarchy, then every president since 2000 was a monarch.


Straw, camel, back.

2024 Trump is using the power of the executive in ways even more grotesquely than 2016 Trump.


They could have simply had IAEA inspections.


Trump ripped up JCPOA and you know this. Israel could also do that. Oh but wait then the inspections would find stolen American nuclear material.


Communication lines are always open for discussion and negotiation; the end of one agreement doesn't mean no more agreements.


Agreement requires 2 sides doesn't it? Who's agreeing on the American side?


The premise of going to war with a country because that country may have the capability to win/end it is quite demonic circular reasoning. In this case IL/US should preemptively bunker bust every person in the region that has sovereign will. I think only when the entire region is replaced by Tesla Robots loyal to western chauvinism then IL/US can finally feel safe from the consequences of their own actions like committing genocides.

I visited Nagasaki/Hiroshima a few years ago, at the end of both memorials there are celebrations of NPTs and denuclearization efforts with veneers of 90's nostalgia - as if the job were done. How wrong we all were, today 2 non-NPT nuclear powers bombed a NPT non-nuclear power to prevent imaginary WMD Nukes, triggering a possible regional conflict that will kill millions. The only country that shouldn't have nukes is America - they dropped 2 for vibes because the Nazis already surrendered and they wanted to try out their new toy. IL\US project their genocidal tendencies onto others then claim preemptive strikes. Both countries a threat to world peace. It's clear now the only way these two countries leave you alone is if you have a nuke. Any sovereign logical leader will now pursue them. IL/US have made the world a much more dangerous place just because they want to continue the holocaust of Gaza.

Shame.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: