Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I somewhat agree, but for lack of a better word, what would you use? Quadratically doesn't have the same punch


Algorithmic? Big-O? Polynomially? Linear improvement? O(n^2) to O(n)? Or if you want to be less mathematically precise: enormous improvement?

Using exponential in this way in any context is a faux pas, because it's highly ambiguous, and requires context for clarification. But in this situation the context clearly resolved to the mathematically accurate definition, except it was used in the other way.


Quadratically doesn't have the same punch because it is actually exponentially less than exponentially. So doing it for extra punch (as opposed to not knowing the correct word) in a technical context would just be lying. It'd be like a paper saying they had a result with p less than one in a trillion for "extra punch" when they actually had p=0.1.


“From quadratic to linear” seems fine.


If you just mean "a lot" in a non-technical sense, there are plenty of words available. enormously. immensely. tremendously. remarkably. incredibly. vastly.


“From quadratic to linear” or “... to constant” seems fine.


"by a factor of `n`" also sounds impressive.


Runtimes dropped precipitously.


“Dramatically” ?


"a lot"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: