You reply that the FAA is clear. Someone points out the article is about Ireland. You reply about the UK. You know the UK and Ireland aren't the same, right?
Maybe read the article, as it discusses the ambiguity in Irish law about airspace. The word "reasonable" occurs.
In practice, that's what I do when I fly my drones in my Canadian neighbourhood. Sure, the airspace above someone's property isn't theirs, but that doesn't mean I want to annoy my neighbours. So I tend to fly high enough that they don't even see or hear my drones at all. I try and be "reasonable" like my Irish cousins.
Here's my latest drone photo. I doubt any of my neighbours saw or heard this flight:
Despite your quick dismissals, the article actually explains quite well why the law is ambiguous - namely, that the height to which the property owner owns the air is only defined by what is "reasonable", but doesn't give an actual meter height that the property owner owns. And the article recommends that regulation defining this height is something that would benefit all parties.
