Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it just me that finds that while Gemini 2.5 is able to generate a lot of code that the end results are usually lackluster compared to Claude and even ChatGPT? I also find it hard-headed and frequently does things in ways I explicitly told it not to. The massive context window is pretty great though and enables me to do things I can't with the others so it still gets used a lot.


How are you using it?

I find that I get the best results from 2.5 Pro via Google AI Studio with a low temperature (0.2-0.3).


AI Studio as well, but I haven't played around with the temperature too much and even then I only lowered it to like 0.8 a few times. So I'll have to try this out. Thanks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: