Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The main problem with your wall of links from a professional medical PoV is it utterly lacks any context.

The very famous meta studies with all the negative correlations get all the bad associations with flouride from regions where water naturally has extremely high (relative to most other parts of the world) levels of fluoride in addition to high levels of many other uncommon concentrations.

Some of these regions also have additional problems with industry waste.

Put simply, negative correlations about unattended children in swimming pools cannot be extrapolated to infer negative correlations about young children and sippy cups of water.



Again, it was in response to an (mis)unanswered question for that specific information. I don't get what the issue is.


It’s basically coping responses from people who are starting to realize they have been loudly wrong for years. It’s a fairly human response I suppose. They’ll get over it eventually after they go through the stages of grief or whatever.


> coping responses

No? What is a coping response? I asked the commenter to provide context to their links that supposedly show evidence for what the initial question was (does fluoride at the concentrations in drinking water cause harm), which they definitely do not show evidence for.


The thing is you are not being curious. You are basically putting your head in the sand and goading at people to drag it out for you.


You need to stop attacking people on HN. It's not permitted here. You are free to disagree with their statements and positions, but making character judgments like this is not OK.


> You are basically putting your head in the sand and goading at people to drag it out for you

Nah. I pretty much agree with what Utah is doing here (though I’d prefer just not mandating it and making the decision as local as it needs to be). OP’s link list looks AI generated. That’s just not a good-faith comment.


OP has already said that it was not AI generated and that he spent months doing due diligence to compile that list.

I suppose you want a summary, well read the abstracts of the papers. It's not that challenging, is it?


> OP has already said that it was not AI generated

They first went defensive when asked about it up thread [1].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43519312




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: