I think this means you're making the opposite argument that most C++ folks do, w... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		steveklabnik 5 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Memory safety for web fonts I think this means you're making the opposite argument that most C++ folks do, which is that C with classes is bad, and more prone to security issues than "modern C++" is.

GoblinSlayer 5 months ago [–]

My argument is that C with classes is bad when it uses bad security practice, not because it must be bad.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact