Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If you need to influence an executive where their experiences may be out of touch with your reality, help them see the impact through stories, videos, and data.

> Remember, they live literally in another world. This doesn't necessarily make them evil, just disconnected. I do not want to be "out of touch" but it is important to acknowledge that this does happen over time.

No they don’t. We all live in the same world and it’s everyone’s responsibility to realize that and our impact on those around us as well as our environment. The ruling class’ personality disorders (detaching from the common folk) are primarily their problems and should be dealt with by them, not worked around by us.




>We all live in the same world and it’s everyone’s responsibility to realize that and our impact on those around us as well as our environment.

It is physically impossible to be aware of the entirety of one's impact on others. One might be able to dimly perceive how the person across from you is feeling about something you said or did, but even in simple one to one interactions, there's frequent miscommunication and signal loss. If you extend this to making decisions that have an impact on not just one but hundreds or thousands of people, it's literally impossible to know the true impact of all those decisions on all those people. Good decision makers will intentionally cultivate information flows that provide them some insight but those are themselves imperfect.


And bad decision makers won't even try, and might attack the people who try to do it for them. And there are a shitload of bad decision makers. And I don't owe them anything.


>It is physically impossible to be aware of the entirety of one's impact on others.

No it isn't. You just need a shred of empathy.


You're passing over the key word "entirety." It is beyond our ability to understand the entirety of how our actions affect our own individual selves. How can we understand the entirety of how our actions affect dozens, hundreds or thousands of people every day. I would not trust someone who thought they only needed a dash of empathy to have this much insight.


“Try and convince them that you’re not an animal”

Depressingly laughable suggestion.

Giving Jared (from Silicon Valley) suggesting “scream your name to your attacker so they are forced to recognize you are human” vibes.


This is just an executive trying to gather sympathy for themselves, and make others "empathize" with their decisions.

But it's sugarcoated. The only part that makes sense is the fact they are sociopaths who only care about work success.

The rest of it is just sugarcoating the fact that they make these decisions because they simply couldn't give a shit what their peers below them think. They know it fucks with them and that they don't like it. It's not some "oh we don't understand cause we're too rich" sob story.


agreed, thats the vibe I got from this story as well.

like fuck off with that, the data and the vibes all point to it being better for the employees and their productivity to work from home. too many "I went through it so you have to as well" types that aren't interested in evolving stuck in their old ways


> they live literally in another world

Classic case of semantic drift, as "literally" now means "figuratively", but with emphasis. Try "virtually", "practically", or "all but".


In a sense it is literal, if "world" is understood not as "planet earth" or "this realm of existence" but instead as a social circle. e.g. "He is from the software world," doesn't mean "He is from a world made up of software," but instead "He works in and is surrounded by people who develop software professionally." In that sense, a lot of these people are (literally) living in a world that is socially, physically, and even conceptually separate from those of lesser means.


Is that a useful understanding of "world" in this case? I think it's important to remember that we share the same planet, the same economic system, the same borders and system of visas. This way, their inordinate privileges stand out in sharp relief. It seems almost apologetic to say they live in a different world.


"Literally" has been used for emphasis in this way for hundreds of years.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/misuse-of-literally


I mean the US electoral college disagrees with you.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: