Oh hell no. I can't believe this shit... and Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier was such a good game too. T_T
Next time I want to play an Ubisoft game I'm just going to pirate it.
EDIT: I buy 99% of my video games through Steam, and when the games I get through Steam want to use their own launcher (play, windows live games, or EA's Origin, for example) I always get peeved.. to find out it allows arbitrary remote code execution is absolutely infuriating.
EDIT: Oh, btw, I'm using Opera 12.
EDIT: Protect yourself (in Opera, at least) by going to Settings -> Preferences(menu option) -> Advanced(Tab) -> Downloads(left menu bar) -> Search for "uplay" and delete the associated row.
I hate the hoop jumping in modern games. I was playing Street Fighter 4 recently and it comes up with "oh, you want to save your single player game? You have to create a MicrosoftWindowsBingGamesPhone8ForXboxLive.Net account" .
Then of course you have to wait for the damn thing to sign in every time you want to play the game "Connection failed, do you want to retry?"
I've found myself having to deal with roughly 100% more bullshit launcher-patch-launcher-settings-signup-login-wait crap since I've started buying games on Steam instead of just straight up pirating them like I did when I was dirt poor.
Honestly, about 1 in every 2-3 games I play I find myself wondering why I didn't just pirate it to begin with. When your software has the kind of extra "features" that make your user base actually consider downloading a cracked, illegal copy after buying the real deal, you know you've royally fucked up somewhere along the way.
Short of doing extensive background research on a title, Steam has no indication of a game's dependence on some third party launcher or cloud service, so every time I run a new game for the first time I have to clench and pray the Windows Live overlay doesn't drop down.
Arkham City requires GFWL, almost made me quit the game I bought and go pirate it. Still considering it, honestly.
Not only did it fail to log me in the first time and totally dropped my first hour of gameplay, but I ended up having to reset a password and spend over half an hour trying to get Arkham City and GFWL live to work together.
I lost over 1.5 hours of time to that bullshit, and a pirate would have lost 0 hours.
I am ONCE AGAIN bitten in the ass for being a legitimate customer instead of a dirty pirate.
Fable 3 doesn't mention GFWL anywhere, except that it's published by "Microsoft Games Studios" which would be a big hint... if you look at publisher info.
Which is why I say it's usually a crap shoot. :(
EDIT: In terms of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Future Soldier specifically, it doesn't mention Uplay anywhere on the Steam store page at all. It's like "surprise! This 3rd party launcher / DRM / rootkit comes with it, absolutely free!"
Just spotted it, the Batman games hide it in the System requirements:
> Online play requires log-in to Games For Windows – Live
So I guess it's in the DRM list if you need it to play singleplayer, and in system reqs if you don't. Seems fair, but I'd still rather have it be consistent. No reason S8 couldn't list it in both spots.
Still, I habitually don't read System Reqs. I'd expect something more like one of the "Single Player", "Multi Player" bullets under the ESRB rating. "Requires 3rd party bullshit"
Agreed. There's no game that my desktop doesn't meet the minimum requirements for, and won't be for at least a few years. I don't make a habit of checking them.
Couldn't Steam pull the game from their shop? Prevent new people from buying it and remotely de-activate/remove existing installs of the game?
Proponants of the walled garden 'App Store' model point out how it's good for users, since it's more secure. Well, is this a case for that? Will the closed app store model step up to the plate now?
Or is the walled garden no better for users, but much better for the sellers of software?
When a walled garden actually is better for users, they could choose to participate. When users aren't allowed to choose, you can be pretty sure who the primary beneficiary is.
I'm just not buying any more Ubisoft games. Between the abortion of the user experience that is UPlay, their crappy always-online DRM, and then this, I'm just done giving them my money, I don't care how much I like their games.
There's no shortage of good games to play, and I'm just not going to give my money to companies that abuse their customers like Ubisoft does.
Hey Ubisoft, because I hope someone there is reading this thread: When your DRM is so bad that it makes people who would otherwise buy your games want to pirate them, you have utterly, totally, and completely failed. Pass that on to your boss please.
Edit: Protect yourself in Chrome by going to about:plugins and just turning it off.
Pirating the software does not do anything here. The security hole is not related to the DRM and pirated versions come with the same UPlay installs as legitimate copies.
Next time I want to play an Ubisoft game I'm just going to pirate it.
EDIT: I buy 99% of my video games through Steam, and when the games I get through Steam want to use their own launcher (play, windows live games, or EA's Origin, for example) I always get peeved.. to find out it allows arbitrary remote code execution is absolutely infuriating.
EDIT: Oh, btw, I'm using Opera 12.
EDIT: Protect yourself (in Opera, at least) by going to Settings -> Preferences(menu option) -> Advanced(Tab) -> Downloads(left menu bar) -> Search for "uplay" and delete the associated row.