That's now how it works in the US. Every 2 years we have an opportunity to vote for our representatives. They set the budget, and if we don't like it we can elect new representatives who will set a budget closer to our liking.

This isn't a matter of taxes being spent on things we didn't agree to, because spending this money is a priority for many Americans. For other's it's not, but that doesn't mean the money is being coerced. That's the deal with living in a pluralistic society; your personal priorities aren't the only ones. Sometimes public money is spent on things you don't like, and that's okay because other people don't like their money being spent on the things you do like. Everyone is happy yet unhappy - compromise.

The "taxation is theft" right wing talking line is about as intellectually honest as the "property is theft" left wing talking line.

Not really. Forceful taxation (by jail) to redistribute the money to states or national security is a boring topic, but redistribution of wealth to ‘for n in NATIONS’ is worth an intellectual challenge.

And even if you don’t care about taxation, why is the US running this entity and not supprting an international donation match to the UN? The US is running a deficit if you haven’t noticed, not a surplus.

There's also an underlying validity to the "property is theft" argument. They both have a correct underlying principle. And both are wrong in the totality.

> a deficit

A deficit in little pieces of paper they print themselves, and most of that debt is to themselves.

It sounds like you don’t know how interest or debt works. If you have children, your children are going to be paying for generations