> I remember Actyx being a rust-libp2p user, but I wasn't aware that they failed. Do you have more info? How and why? It would be great if we could learn from them.
They (we?) unfortunately never found product-market-fit. Actyx targeted the SME factory space with a p2p application platform. Turns out that developers in general don’t want to deal with the additional complexities of anything lesser than strong consistency, especially if they don’t fully drank the distribute-everything kool-aid. And SMEs don’t really bother either.
Philosophically decentralization is the right thing to do, but I’m thinking more and more that federation might actually be the compromise in the long run, at least for consumer apps. The only valid use cases for p2p edge devices with loose connectivity are in military applications.
They (we?) unfortunately never found product-market-fit. Actyx targeted the SME factory space with a p2p application platform. Turns out that developers in general don’t want to deal with the additional complexities of anything lesser than strong consistency, especially if they don’t fully drank the distribute-everything kool-aid. And SMEs don’t really bother either.
Philosophically decentralization is the right thing to do, but I’m thinking more and more that federation might actually be the compromise in the long run, at least for consumer apps. The only valid use cases for p2p edge devices with loose connectivity are in military applications.