Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

See? It's just wrong-think, based on appeals to emotion.


No, in that case it would be a demonstration of how unsuitable that person is for the job.


Appreciate the demonstration of why Chatham House Rule can protect opinions on the left side of the spectrum. Just to be clear, this is a real live example of someone saying that an individual should be punished for their opinions, separate from their actions.


It's more a demonstration of how this rule can be used to protect views on the misogynistic side of the spectrum and quietly undermine women and girls. Perhaps, it's how much of this lobbying for male privilege was actually done.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: