> Longer papers with more claims have more to prove, not less. I imagine they would be harder to pass peer review.
Yes, a longer paper puts more work on the peer reviewers (handful of people). But splitting one project in multiple papers puts more work on the reader (thousands of people). There is a balance to strike.
Yes, a longer paper puts more work on the peer reviewers (handful of people). But splitting one project in multiple papers puts more work on the reader (thousands of people). There is a balance to strike.