See. This is the sort of childish rhetoric one will get from Mastodon showing why little to no-one will take the site seriously, let alone the other fundamental problems that still exist.
So when are you going to tell me how many DAUs Mastodon has, to show after the failed migration from Twitter / X?
What IS childish is you seemingly popping up in every discussion that dares bring up Mastodon, to shoehorn in some tedious variation of "Mastodon is terrible!" zinger. To the point where it seems personal. What did Mastodon do to hurt you?
Why do you care so deeply to moan, at every chance you can, about something that doesn't impact you one way or another?
As expected. Without you providing any answer to my previous question proves my point once again as to why little to no-one can realistically take Mastodon seriously, nor do they want to choose to sign up.
You're the only one complaining about (and seemingly offended) over the fact that someone showing the basic reasons why former Twitter / X and new users are not choosing to move to Mastodon, as other social networks such as Bluesky have largely handled this better than Mastodon should have.
So once again, how many DAUs does Mastodon have to show for after the failed migration from Twitter / X?
I have no connection to Mastodon (other than having an account), and am not a representative of theirs or their users, except maybe in your fevered mind. I wouldn't know how many DAUs the Mastodon network has, nor do I care, because it's irrelevant to me.
Besides, I'm certainly not the only one complaining about your obsession:
Says the one who is obsessed with being the only direct reply-person about me critiquing Mastodon's fundamental issues, (with evidence and predictions) whilst you reacting without any counter-argument other than issuing these amusing complaints. Your "question" was an attempt to derail the discussion and added nothing other than you being childish.
An influx of new users from Twitter / X to Mastodon should have happened weeks ago in the millions, just like it did with Bluesky. Twice. Why didn't it? I provided that straight answer to everyone here, and somehow that offended you?
Please.
> You've been at it for over TWO YEARS, now, banging that drum of "Mastodon has few users, therefor it is a failure".
So it is evident that after two years (since the Twitter / X takeover), Mastodon was entirely confusing for new users and was unconvincing for them to stay. Even when there was a significant change, it was self-contradictory.
My point continues to still stand unchallenged and this is why little to no-one can take you or Mastodon seriously.
So when are you going to tell me how many DAUs Mastodon has, to show after the failed migration from Twitter / X?