Well I went into the article expecting it to be the 143rd article in the ouroborous of articles that all reference each other and at the bottom of them all is that one single absolutely horrible WFH study that was done in Europe a few years ago, but I got stuck before even getting into the article.
The title: "Working From Home Is Powering Productivity" -> "X is Y".
The main headline: "A fivefold increase in remote work since the pandemic could boost economic growth and bring wider benefits" -> "X could Y".
Before even getting into the article they went from strongly claiming something to no longer claiming something but instead using a weasel word that could mean anything.
I could be the King of France. I could be 9 feet tall. Could doesn't mean anything.
Instantly closed the article, and not reading further.
The title: "Working From Home Is Powering Productivity" -> "X is Y".
The main headline: "A fivefold increase in remote work since the pandemic could boost economic growth and bring wider benefits" -> "X could Y".
Before even getting into the article they went from strongly claiming something to no longer claiming something but instead using a weasel word that could mean anything.
I could be the King of France. I could be 9 feet tall. Could doesn't mean anything.
Instantly closed the article, and not reading further.