> The hypothesis Newman is implicitly presenting in TFA is that Tinniswood is indeed very old,
I'm curious why the census isn't presented as evidence of location. UK census are very informative and the 1921 census is the most recent one available.
I'll note that a very small percentage of individuals aren't found (illegible, record loss, issue at taking) but it's exceptional.
From there I'd see where his parents were in the 1911 census. If it's the same location, odds are high that's where he was born.
Exceptions are possible. To help rule them out, I'd research and build-out the extended family. In that day, siblings/cousins banded together; local migration shows up when viewing the lateral family.
Is it not possible that there really was a John Alfred Tinniswood living in 1921 but the man who now claims to be him in 2024 is actually someone else who stole the original's identity when he died unrecorded?
I'm curious why the census isn't presented as evidence of location. UK census are very informative and the 1921 census is the most recent one available.
I'll note that a very small percentage of individuals aren't found (illegible, record loss, issue at taking) but it's exceptional.