Yeah, I suppose that's fair. Still, the musl malloc implementation is just the most infamous example of its subpar performance. Obviously glibc comes with an enormous amount of functionality and performance optimizations.
Somewhat unrelated, but I'm looking forward to llvm-libc becoming a practical replacement for musl. I'd love a modern, non-gnu libc implementation that isn't so dogmatic.
Somewhat unrelated, but I'm looking forward to llvm-libc becoming a practical replacement for musl. I'd love a modern, non-gnu libc implementation that isn't so dogmatic.