Pandas support as input and output isn't going anywhere. People can continue to bring their pandas DataFrames to Ibis and run Ibis expressions against them.
> pandas made sense and might still make sense for many, especially who are migrating from R and are already comfortable with dataframe paradigm.
Yes, and nothing is different about the paradigm after the changes outlined in the blog post, it's still a dataframe paradigm.
> using the same paradigm and just saying "we run faster" does not solve the ergonomics or the reason why people adopted this way of processing data.
This seems to indicate you _do_ understand that the paradigm isn't changing but then does a complete 180 into complaining about Ibis not solving pandas ergonomics issues. Which is it?
> pandas made sense and might still make sense for many, especially who are migrating from R and are already comfortable with dataframe paradigm.
Yes, and nothing is different about the paradigm after the changes outlined in the blog post, it's still a dataframe paradigm.
> using the same paradigm and just saying "we run faster" does not solve the ergonomics or the reason why people adopted this way of processing data.
This seems to indicate you _do_ understand that the paradigm isn't changing but then does a complete 180 into complaining about Ibis not solving pandas ergonomics issues. Which is it?