Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I welcome your "not a red line" interpretation of quotes like these:

> Dmitry Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Putin’s powerful security council, was more explicit in January. “The defeat of a nuclear power in a conventional war may trigger a nuclear war,” he said. - https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/01/...

> Anticipating international condemnation and countermeasures, Putin issued a stark warning to other countries not to meddle, saying, “whoever tries to impede us, let alone create threats for our country and its people, must know that the Russian response will be immediate and lead to the consequences you have never seen in history.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/russia-launches-attacks-u...




The first one is a red line but not one that is close to being crossed, since Ukraine is losing the war quite badly.

The second is an extremely vague threat not to mess with Russia. There is no line drawn at all, red or otherwise.

Do you see a hidden code in these statements or something? I dont see what you're getting at at all.


You forgot that in the first quote he's not even addressing the situation in Ukraine, since that's only a special military operation, right?

Also a chocolate cookie recipe please.


Well there you go then. The red lines are a dot to you.


will somebody please think about them red lines!




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: