Obviously this is from a company that sells their own embedded real-time operating system. The product page of their "INTEGRITY" RTOS touts separation of components and reliability as the first/main selling points, so it's no wonder that they try to make other solutions appear unreliable or insecure.
They claim that their RTOS, being Common-Critieria-7 certified, mathematically proven secure and has been approved for the highest level of safety by the federal aviation industry and the NSA.
But honestly, when was the last time you've heard about a server being compromized by a Kernel bug (which should be about the level their RTOS operates on), in constrast to unfiltered user-input being used in, say, SQL queries?
They claim that their RTOS, being Common-Critieria-7 certified, mathematically proven secure and has been approved for the highest level of safety by the federal aviation industry and the NSA.
But honestly, when was the last time you've heard about a server being compromized by a Kernel bug (which should be about the level their RTOS operates on), in constrast to unfiltered user-input being used in, say, SQL queries?