Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Here's a solution.

Candidates should be paid for their time in the interview process.




Tried that. Word got out that people could get paid for interviews. Got a lot of people using us for paid interview practice with no intention of joining.

Stopped doing that.


I'd give it a balance if you ever wanted to try it again

- 2 calls with recruiting and whatever technical screen you want.

- Take home that is paid X amount

- follow up take home review to verify they did it

- offer.

Big issue I have with take homes is that they love to be the first step, not the middle one. you can probably weed out a lot of candidates and pay only the ones you seriously consider with this approach.

Also solves a lot of spec work issues in other industries.


What would happen if it was mandated by law that all prospective employers do this?


So one could just go to a different interview every day and get paid for not working?


It sounds like interviewers would have to change their interview process to account for this.

Can you think of some ways that they could innovate the interview process if spurred on my this new constraint?


Most likely find some loophole that lets them keep more or less the same process but doesn't quite reach the legal criteria that require it to be paid.


Great news! Initech has recently rolled out our exclusive Software Developer Practice Interview Platform™. Through this innovative platform, prospective Initech software developers can do a number of practice interviews with real Initech employees, and get graded on their performance. Move up the leaderboard and compete with your friends and colleagues. Please Note: only those with a score of 90% or higher on the Practice Interview Platform will be considered for actual (paid) interviews.


I bet you could think of a few ways to craft the law to eliminate or mitigate this.

Let's hear them.


Yeah, right, because real life is full of examples of laws with no loopholes...


Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

Can you think of any laws that have loopholes but we're still better off for their existence?


You don't seriously expect me to argue your position for you, do you? If you want to convince someone that such a law would be beneficial, feel free to stop sealioning and start making actual arguments.


Can you think of any instances where there are laws that have very little or no loopholes?

What separates those laws from the kind of law we're talking about? How are they different? How are they the same?




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: