I'm glad to see that Stripe has lit such a fire under their competitors. I'm new to the payment gateway scene—can anyone with experience give a comparison of Stripe vs Braintree's APIs?
I’ve not used Stripe, but I’ve used Braintree for a while. Braintree is an older company, and it seems to have a bigger, lower level API. Stripe’s is much higher level, and looks like it could be both simpler and easier to use. This is probably not just because of age, but also because Stripe wraps and owns your merchant account (it looks like), while Braintree works with a merchant account, exposing many more technical details of the payments process (thus making you manage them).
Braintree’s API, while REST underneath, is only supported at the library level and they have more languages supported for this reason than Stripe (Including mobile specific APIs). Obviously this makes it much easier to support newer, hipper languages with Stripe - just write your own wrapper to the REST API.
Most of the big features seem to be supported on both platforms, one off and reoccurring payments, token based transactions, etc.
Started to use Stripe recently for a project and have used Braintree extensively for work. Your comparison is spot on.
There are some small differences such as, Stripe can send credit card details through AJAX to their servers so they are never sent to yours. Whereas Braintree uses Javascript encryption to do it, so the encrypted values are sent to your server. But I haven't seen anything that only Braintree supports yet.
Tradeoff with Stripe is that while you get a much simpler API, it (likely) will cost you more than Braintree depending on scale and what cards are commonly used.
The nice part of sending the data to your servers with client side encryption is that you can do validation before sending to the payment gateway. For example, if you want to ensure everyone enters a cardholder name, you can validate the non-encrypted fields before eating the cost of calling a payment gateway.
You can do some of these validations in javascript, but javascript is error-prone (firebug) and not as flexible (have access to a lot more data server side).
Hugely disappointed that India is not among the countries Braintree is expanding to. People in other areas(like europe) have at least one half decent payment gateway provider. In India we have NONE.
This is the biggest payment gateway in India - http://www.ccavenue.com/content/pricing.jsp
they charge 3-7% and they suck. API docs suck, payments get timed out etc. There is an annual "maintenance" charge!
Developers (and users) are really fed up with the low quality of payment providers in India. - have a look at these
The problem with India is that the indian government is broken (or is at least percived to be broken) outside of India. I wouldn't risk my customers money there -- too much corruption.
I doubt it will ever be available in Nigeria either, nor most of Africa.
I don't know how to respond to this :). It is so widely off the mark that I can only shake my head in surprise. A huge number of MNC's dominate certain sectors of the economy. India is one of the top destinations for FDI in the world. See - http://unctad.org/en/docs/diaeia20104_en.pdf. Equating India to Nigeria .. Sheesh.. I don't know whether you were trolling or serious!
I don't think FDI is a very good indication for the challenges that a consumer payment processing company might encounter in India, especially in relation to their product.
Point was there are lot of International companies successfully doing business in India. What do you think are the challenges consumer payment processing company might encounter in India, especially in relation to their product?
I think the regulatory environment for setting up a business, obtaining licenses, etc is somewhat orthogonal to how local laws and enforcement deal with (not only per letter of the law, but enforcement) fraud, spam, phishing, chargebacks, et al. I don't mean to profess complete familiarity with the matter here, but it's just one area where Braintree's difficulty is not coupled directly to the amount of FDI. My naive understanding is that at this time that these kinds of issues (such as enforcement of contracts with small entities) are still somewhat in the wild-west phase in India.
But as other posters have noticed, it does look like there is an emphasis on the EU and members of the Commonwealth. So it may just be down to the number of very distinct regulatory regimes Braintree was comfortable dealing with at the time, so this could be much speculation about nothing.
Don't be too sad ... my countries Malaysia, Singapore, or any Asian countries is neither in the list ... but this is a great first step ... hope more competitors (Stripe, Square, etc.) will follow ..
I was hoping for Stripe to go international soon but Braintree seems like a good alternative for all of us who don't want to wait any longer (and are reluctant to use Paypal)
I really like Stripe, but Braintree is a great company too. I think both companies are pulling the industry forward.
I would still seriously consider setting up a US business in most cases, since it makes everything else easier, if you want to take investment, enter the us market, etc.
I noticed in the article on Braintree's blog they mention "Support for local, non-credit card payment methods will be added in the coming year" ... so hopefully.
So here is the list: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom